 |
||
 |
        |
 |
 |
||
| MP3 Radio | Website News Briefs: | |||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
 |
|
 |
1. Giuliani: Obama Has 'No Clue' What Is Going On in Middle East
by Rachel Hirshfeld
Former Mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, spoke to Sean Hannity of Fox News about the dangers of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons as well as other pressing issues plaguing the region.
Giuliani said that President Obama has “no clue” what us going on in the Middle East and that he is living in a “fairly naïve world.”
Giuliani stated that Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism and for the American administration not to treat it as such is simply “mindboggling.” He said America, whose military capabilities far surpass those of Iran, should be willing and prepared to use military actions against the regime. Part of the problem, Giuliani noted, lies in the fact that Iran views Obama as a “weak president” and does not feel threatened by the possibility of America taking military actions.
In response to Hannity’s questions regarding the increasing unrest in Egypt, the radical Muslim Brotherhood coming to power and the current American hostage situation, Giuliani replied that this was “the risk everyone was worried about… pushing over Mubarak too quickly” and not having “any real sense of who is taking over.” He said that while Mubarak was a “bad dictator” he maintained ‘good’ relations with Israel, did not pose a threat to the United States and did not take hostages.
Giuliani stated, “I don’t know why we haven’t reacted more strongly” with regard to the 19 Americans being taken hostage in Egypt for, allegedly, inciting “unrest.” He said that this is an “insane Islamic extremist act” and that the Obama administration continues to act “nonchalantly.”
With regards to the presidential race and leading Republican candidates, Giuliani said that the key objective remains defeating Obama. He said that while the economy is a pressing issue, the next American president must be willing to forcefully take on vital national security concerns.
Comment on this story
by Rachel Hirshfeld
Former Mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, spoke to Sean Hannity of Fox News about the dangers of Iran acquiring nuclear weapons as well as other pressing issues plaguing the region.
Giuliani said that President Obama has “no clue” what us going on in the Middle East and that he is living in a “fairly naïve world.”
Giuliani stated that Iran is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism and for the American administration not to treat it as such is simply “mindboggling.” He said America, whose military capabilities far surpass those of Iran, should be willing and prepared to use military actions against the regime. Part of the problem, Giuliani noted, lies in the fact that Iran views Obama as a “weak president” and does not feel threatened by the possibility of America taking military actions.
In response to Hannity’s questions regarding the increasing unrest in Egypt, the radical Muslim Brotherhood coming to power and the current American hostage situation, Giuliani replied that this was “the risk everyone was worried about… pushing over Mubarak too quickly” and not having “any real sense of who is taking over.” He said that while Mubarak was a “bad dictator” he maintained ‘good’ relations with Israel, did not pose a threat to the United States and did not take hostages.
Giuliani stated, “I don’t know why we haven’t reacted more strongly” with regard to the 19 Americans being taken hostage in Egypt for, allegedly, inciting “unrest.” He said that this is an “insane Islamic extremist act” and that the Obama administration continues to act “nonchalantly.”
With regards to the presidential race and leading Republican candidates, Giuliani said that the key objective remains defeating Obama. He said that while the economy is a pressing issue, the next American president must be willing to forcefully take on vital national security concerns.
Tags: Israel ,Iran ,Obama ,Egypt ,Muslim Brotherhood ,presidential elections
More on this topic
Comment on this story
2. Israel's Naval Commandos Rescue Fishermen
by Gil Ronen
Soldiers from the IDF elite marine commando unit, Shayetet 13, rescued a group of five civilians whose fishing boat sank at sea early on Monday. The civilians were safely rescued and no injuries were reported, according to the IDF Website.
The incident occurred opposite Neveh Yam, about 20 km south of Haifa.
Shayetet 13 soldiers arrived on the scene when Israeli police informed the Navy of a boat in distress. The soldiers found a sinking fishing boat and a damaged motorboat, with five civilians on board.
The Mark 1 inflatable motorboat had left shore with three civilians on board, all in their 20s. The boat's motor was damaged at sea as a result of strong winds and it drifted westward.
Two fishermen who were in the area in their boat attempted to rescue them. The three men from the motorboat climbed onto the fishing boat, but the fishing boat began to sink. All five then returned to the damaged motorboat and waited for assistance.
The IDF commando marine forces arrived quickly on the scene, along with a Dabur patrol boat, and safely evacuated the civilians to shore.
Comment on this story
by Gil Ronen
Soldiers from the IDF elite marine commando unit, Shayetet 13, rescued a group of five civilians whose fishing boat sank at sea early on Monday. The civilians were safely rescued and no injuries were reported, according to the IDF Website.
The incident occurred opposite Neveh Yam, about 20 km south of Haifa.
Shayetet 13 soldiers arrived on the scene when Israeli police informed the Navy of a boat in distress. The soldiers found a sinking fishing boat and a damaged motorboat, with five civilians on board.
The Mark 1 inflatable motorboat had left shore with three civilians on board, all in their 20s. The boat's motor was damaged at sea as a result of strong winds and it drifted westward.
Two fishermen who were in the area in their boat attempted to rescue them. The three men from the motorboat climbed onto the fishing boat, but the fishing boat began to sink. All five then returned to the damaged motorboat and waited for assistance.
The IDF commando marine forces arrived quickly on the scene, along with a Dabur patrol boat, and safely evacuated the civilians to shore.
Tags: Commando 13 ,Navy
More on this topic
Comment on this story
3. India to Deport Chabad Couple for ‘Suspicious Activities’
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Indian plans to deport a Chabad couple for “suspicious activities” after officials tracked them for a year.
Chabad emissaries throughout the world are known to work solely for the benefit of local Jews and Jewish tourists and have not been involved in the past with any illegal activities, and Chabad denies the allegations.
The Times of India reported that Rabbi Zalman Shneor and his wife Yaffa Shenoi arrived in Kochi in March 2010 and rented a house for “far higher than the market rate."
It quoted an intelligence official as saying, "We have traced the couple's financial transactions. Preliminary investigations suggest similar Israelis are camping in various parts of the country."
Rabbi Shneor told the Chabad website Tuesday, “I have no idea how the Indian intelligence officials reached their conclusions. Maybe there has been a mistake because it is clear that that the allegations are baseless.
“I was invited here by the Jewish community and my sole duty is to work with it night and day.”
He estimated the source for the allegations may be libelous statements from a local non-Jewish neighbor who simply is jealous of the community, which has been successful in opening up a large synagogue and expanding Jewish activities in the area.
Rabbi Shneor suggested that non-Jews may have asked themselves, “Where is the money coming from?” and drew the wrong conclusions from late-night meetings and functions on the Sabbath.
The intelligence report noted that “a group of people turned up at the couple's rented house regularly and held meetings,” but such activity is not only common at Chabad centers around the world... it is one of the purposes for which it operates. That is -- providing a meeting place for Jews.
The report added: "These meetings lasted for hours in the night. They were under close surveillance.”
The newspaper said the couple had been tracked for a year, and strangely noted, without making any connection to the rabbi, "Central intelligence got an alert about a covert operation being carried out by suspected Israeli agents after the 26/11 terror attacks in which south Mumbai's Chabad House came under attack and six Jews, including a Rabbi and his pregnant wife, were killed. A communication was sent to all states and it was our wing in Kerala that traced this couple at Fort Kochi.”
Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife Rivka were murdered along with four other Jews at the Chabad House in Mumbai in the mega-terror attacks on Mumbai hotels three years ago.
Comment on this story
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Indian plans to deport a Chabad couple for “suspicious activities” after officials tracked them for a year.
Chabad emissaries throughout the world are known to work solely for the benefit of local Jews and Jewish tourists and have not been involved in the past with any illegal activities, and Chabad denies the allegations.
The Times of India reported that Rabbi Zalman Shneor and his wife Yaffa Shenoi arrived in Kochi in March 2010 and rented a house for “far higher than the market rate."
It quoted an intelligence official as saying, "We have traced the couple's financial transactions. Preliminary investigations suggest similar Israelis are camping in various parts of the country."
Rabbi Shneor told the Chabad website Tuesday, “I have no idea how the Indian intelligence officials reached their conclusions. Maybe there has been a mistake because it is clear that that the allegations are baseless.
“I was invited here by the Jewish community and my sole duty is to work with it night and day.”
He estimated the source for the allegations may be libelous statements from a local non-Jewish neighbor who simply is jealous of the community, which has been successful in opening up a large synagogue and expanding Jewish activities in the area.
Rabbi Shneor suggested that non-Jews may have asked themselves, “Where is the money coming from?” and drew the wrong conclusions from late-night meetings and functions on the Sabbath.
The intelligence report noted that “a group of people turned up at the couple's rented house regularly and held meetings,” but such activity is not only common at Chabad centers around the world... it is one of the purposes for which it operates. That is -- providing a meeting place for Jews.
The report added: "These meetings lasted for hours in the night. They were under close surveillance.”
The newspaper said the couple had been tracked for a year, and strangely noted, without making any connection to the rabbi, "Central intelligence got an alert about a covert operation being carried out by suspected Israeli agents after the 26/11 terror attacks in which south Mumbai's Chabad House came under attack and six Jews, including a Rabbi and his pregnant wife, were killed. A communication was sent to all states and it was our wing in Kerala that traced this couple at Fort Kochi.”
Rabbi Gavriel Holtzberg and his wife Rivka were murdered along with four other Jews at the Chabad House in Mumbai in the mega-terror attacks on Mumbai hotels three years ago.
More on this topic
Comment on this story
4. Iran Ready to 'Stop Oil Exports to Europe'"
by Rachel Hirshfeld
Addressing the United States, the Foreign Ministry spokesman said, “"When you apply the highest level of your power to impose sanctions on a nation and that nation continues on its path decisively, it proves you do not have enough power to halt it," the Associated Press reported.
Comment on this story
by Rachel Hirshfeld
Addressing the United States, the Foreign Ministry spokesman said, “"When you apply the highest level of your power to impose sanctions on a nation and that nation continues on its path decisively, it proves you do not have enough power to halt it," the Associated Press reported.
More on this topic
-
Giuliani: Obama Has 'No Clue' What Is Going On in Middle East -
Netanyahu's Visit to the US: A diplomatic warning?
-
PM Netanyahu: Only Strength Ensures Survival of Jewish People
-
After Barbie, Iran Bans The Simpsons
-
Opinion: The Covert Meaning Behind the Headlines
-
Obama’s Super Bowl Interview an Indicator of Policy on Iran?
Comment on this story
5. NASA Astronaut Gives IAF Cadets Some Space
by Gil Ronen
IAF Flight Academy cadets met with American astronaut Col. William McArthur last week when he paid a unique visit to the IAF Flight Academy. Col. McArthur is a veteran of three space shuttle missions and one expedition to the International Space Station via the Russian Soyuz capsule.
The NASA astronaut arrived in Israel for the Seventh International Ilan Ramon Space Conference held last week. He also visited the Israel National Museum of Science, Technology and Space in Haifa, and gave lectures to students in venues all over Israel.
Col. McArthur began his career in the US Army, where he served as a helicopter pilot and studied advanced aeronautics.
The IAF pilot cadets – who are in the initial phases of training, and still learning basic flight techniques – expressed an interest in the space program, and asked Col. McArthur questions about life as an astronaut and the long journey required of those who wish to become astronauts.
Head IAF Flight Academy instructor, Lt. Col. Peleg, showed Col. McArthur around the Hatzerim Airbase, and briefed him on the IAF's capabilities – with a focus on the 107th F-16i squadron that operates from Hatzerim and goes by the name "The Knights of the Orange Tail."
In his lectures across Israel, the American astronaut said that "we live in a time when more people than in the past may have the opportunity to get to space." He encouraged participants to invest in science studies that would improve their chances of successfully participating in the growing field of outer space endeavor.
When asked about the most appealing factor in exploring outer space, Col. Mc Arthur answered that "the human race is always interested in expanding and seeing what exists beyond the horizon. If I stayed in one place, I would get bored. I will always want to climb the mountain and find out what is there."
Col. McArthur said that while every flight to space will always be interesting and special, he hopes that one day, the flights will become something that interests "more than just a few people."
Comment on this story
by Gil Ronen
IAF Flight Academy cadets met with American astronaut Col. William McArthur last week when he paid a unique visit to the IAF Flight Academy. Col. McArthur is a veteran of three space shuttle missions and one expedition to the International Space Station via the Russian Soyuz capsule.
The NASA astronaut arrived in Israel for the Seventh International Ilan Ramon Space Conference held last week. He also visited the Israel National Museum of Science, Technology and Space in Haifa, and gave lectures to students in venues all over Israel.
Col. McArthur began his career in the US Army, where he served as a helicopter pilot and studied advanced aeronautics.
The IAF pilot cadets – who are in the initial phases of training, and still learning basic flight techniques – expressed an interest in the space program, and asked Col. McArthur questions about life as an astronaut and the long journey required of those who wish to become astronauts.
Head IAF Flight Academy instructor, Lt. Col. Peleg, showed Col. McArthur around the Hatzerim Airbase, and briefed him on the IAF's capabilities – with a focus on the 107th F-16i squadron that operates from Hatzerim and goes by the name "The Knights of the Orange Tail."
In his lectures across Israel, the American astronaut said that "we live in a time when more people than in the past may have the opportunity to get to space." He encouraged participants to invest in science studies that would improve their chances of successfully participating in the growing field of outer space endeavor.
When asked about the most appealing factor in exploring outer space, Col. Mc Arthur answered that "the human race is always interested in expanding and seeing what exists beyond the horizon. If I stayed in one place, I would get bored. I will always want to climb the mountain and find out what is there."
Col. McArthur said that while every flight to space will always be interesting and special, he hopes that one day, the flights will become something that interests "more than just a few people."
Tags: space program ,Ilan Ramon ,Hatzerim
More on this topic
-
Israel's Space Budget Lifts Off: From NIS 10M to 165M
-
Will Israeli Flag be the Third on Moon?
-
Jewish Day School Renamed After Ilan Ramon
-
Israeli Bone Cell Experiment to Take off with Endeavor Shuttle
-
Airport Near Eilat to Be Named for Ilan, Assaf Ramon
-
Jewish Astronaut Carries Jewish Heritage Proclamation to Space
Comment on this story
6. Nearly 50% of US Voters: Use Force to Prevent Iranian Nuke
by Gil Ronen
Nearly half of likely voters think the United States should be willing to use military force to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and that the U.S. should help Israel if it attacks Iran.
According to this week’s The Hill Poll, 49 percent said military force should be used to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, while 31 percent said it should not. Twenty percent were not sure.
Sixty-two percent of likely voters said they were somewhat or very concerned about the possibility Iran would carry out a terrorist strike on the U.S., while 37 percent said they were not very concerned or not at all concerned about it.
The Rasmussen polling agency found that 48 percent of likely voters said that if Israel attacks Iran, the U.S. should help Israel.
"Voters nationwide remain firmly convinced that Iran is likely to develop a nuclear weapon in the near future, and if so, will use it against Israel," said Rasmussen. "At the same time, most also think an Israeli attack on Iran is likely to happen within the next year."
The survey of likely U.S. voters shows that 83 percent believe it is at least somewhat likely Iran will develop a nuclear weapon in the near future, including 5 percent who say that is very likely to happen. Only 11 percent say it’s not very likely or not at all likely that Iran will develop a nuclear weapon soon.
In a Rasmussen poll from November, 38 percent favored U.S. military action if diplomacy fails to stop Iran's nuclear program, while 35 percent opposed such action.
Comment on this story
by Gil Ronen
Nearly half of likely voters think the United States should be willing to use military force to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and that the U.S. should help Israel if it attacks Iran.
According to this week’s The Hill Poll, 49 percent said military force should be used to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, while 31 percent said it should not. Twenty percent were not sure.
Sixty-two percent of likely voters said they were somewhat or very concerned about the possibility Iran would carry out a terrorist strike on the U.S., while 37 percent said they were not very concerned or not at all concerned about it.
The Rasmussen polling agency found that 48 percent of likely voters said that if Israel attacks Iran, the U.S. should help Israel.
"Voters nationwide remain firmly convinced that Iran is likely to develop a nuclear weapon in the near future, and if so, will use it against Israel," said Rasmussen. "At the same time, most also think an Israeli attack on Iran is likely to happen within the next year."
The survey of likely U.S. voters shows that 83 percent believe it is at least somewhat likely Iran will develop a nuclear weapon in the near future, including 5 percent who say that is very likely to happen. Only 11 percent say it’s not very likely or not at all likely that Iran will develop a nuclear weapon soon.
In a Rasmussen poll from November, 38 percent favored U.S. military action if diplomacy fails to stop Iran's nuclear program, while 35 percent opposed such action.
Tags: Iran Nuclear threat ,iran US ,Iran Strike
More on this topic
-
US Prof. Tells Newsweek Israel Must Attack Iran – Now
-
Obama: I Don't Think Israel Has Made a Decision on Iran
-
Report: What Will An Israeli Attack on Iran Look Like?
-
Iran's Supreme Leader Threatens Israel, U.S.
-
British Deputy PM Concerned About Israeli Attack on Iran
-
U.S. Worries Israel is about to Strike Iran – Washington Post
Comment on this story
7. Rabbi Shmuely Boteach Files to Run for Congress
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Self-proclaimed “America’s Rabbi” Shmuely Boteach has decided “to throw his yarmulke in the ring” and run for Congress – depending on backing.
He has filed a “”letter of intent” to run as a Republican in the re-designed ninth district in New Jersey against one of two Democratic party incumbents, Steve Rothman or Bill Pascall, who will be running against each other in the Democratic party primaries this summer.
Rabbi Boteach told the New Jersey Jewish Standard that he filed to beat the deadline but that leaving his name on the ballot depends on how much money he can raise for an election campaign.
He is a “celebrity” rabbi with a regular JPost column whose writing has appeared on Arutz Sheva, and he is highly controversial, having written Kosher Sex: A Recipe for Passion and Intimacy in 1999. His recent book “Kosher Jesus” recently was denounced as “heretical” by prominent Canadian Rabbi Emanuel Schochet, who ruled that “it is forbidden for anyone to buy or read this book,” which he charged it encourages a missionary message.
Rabbi Boteach defended his book as one that shows Jesus as "a Torah-observant Jew whose mission it was to restore Jewish observance fully among his Jewish brethren and fight Roman persecution." He added that his book "is the ultimate argument against Christian missionaries" because it offers "significant information to argue convincingly against any Christian attempt to evangelize Jews."
He said he wants to be in Congress in order to demonstrate Jewish values on popular issues, such as abortion and rights of homosexuals, and work to bring down the divorce rate in the United States by making marital counseling a tax deductible expense.
Comment on this story
by Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu
Self-proclaimed “America’s Rabbi” Shmuely Boteach has decided “to throw his yarmulke in the ring” and run for Congress – depending on backing.
He has filed a “”letter of intent” to run as a Republican in the re-designed ninth district in New Jersey against one of two Democratic party incumbents, Steve Rothman or Bill Pascall, who will be running against each other in the Democratic party primaries this summer.
Rabbi Boteach told the New Jersey Jewish Standard that he filed to beat the deadline but that leaving his name on the ballot depends on how much money he can raise for an election campaign.
He is a “celebrity” rabbi with a regular JPost column whose writing has appeared on Arutz Sheva, and he is highly controversial, having written Kosher Sex: A Recipe for Passion and Intimacy in 1999. His recent book “Kosher Jesus” recently was denounced as “heretical” by prominent Canadian Rabbi Emanuel Schochet, who ruled that “it is forbidden for anyone to buy or read this book,” which he charged it encourages a missionary message.
Rabbi Boteach defended his book as one that shows Jesus as "a Torah-observant Jew whose mission it was to restore Jewish observance fully among his Jewish brethren and fight Roman persecution." He added that his book "is the ultimate argument against Christian missionaries" because it offers "significant information to argue convincingly against any Christian attempt to evangelize Jews."
He said he wants to be in Congress in order to demonstrate Jewish values on popular issues, such as abortion and rights of homosexuals, and work to bring down the divorce rate in the United States by making marital counseling a tax deductible expense.
More on this topic
Comment on this story
8. Obama’s Super Bowl Interview an Indicator of Policy on Iran?
by Rachel Hirshfeld
On one of the most anticipated and media-hyped days of the American calendar, President Obama spoke to NBC’s Matt Lauer, just prior to the awaited NFL championship game.
The President, as has become customary on Super Bowl Sunday, gave an interview and attempted to answer some of the dominating questions distracting the public. Iran's nuclear ambitions and the anticipated response of both Israel and the United States remain daily headlines, as the Middle East may be best categorized, these days, as a region of unrest unpredictability.
In response to Lauer’s question regarding whether Israel has promised to give the United States advanced warning, in the event it decides to attack Iran, President Obama responded by saying, “You know, I won’t go into the details of our conversations. I will say we have closer military and intelligence consultation between our two countries than we ever have. And my number one priority continues to be the security of the United States, but also the security of Israel, and we are going to make sure that we work in lockstep as we proceed to try to solve this, hopefully diplomatically."
While it is expected that the two countries maintain close ties, it remains doubtful as to whether these ties result in a similar approach regarding Iran. The President continues to send ambiguous and irresolute messages on the subject, most probably in an attempt to keep and make as many friends as possible prior to the elections.
Commentary Magazine's Jonathan S. Tobin states that "while American diplomats travel the globe trying to corral other nations to support sanctions on Iran, American leaders have been open about their unwillingness to contemplate the use of force and horror at the thought Israel will act on its own."
NBC reported that “current and former U.S. and Israeli officials” with access to highly classified intelligence affirmed that, “[I]t is highly unlikely that the war-weary U.S. would mount a military attack on Iran, instead relying on financial sanctions and diplomatic pressure to squeeze Tehran.”
The Washington Post’s David Ignatius stated, after speaking with U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, that Obama and Panetta continue to tell Israel to refrain from launching a pre-emptive attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities because such an attack would “derail an increasingly successful international economic sanctions program and other non-military efforts to stop Iran from crossing the threshold.”
However, as Tobin notes, “The Israelis — and the Iranians — know the current sanctions program is nowhere close to stopping Iran.”
The president also said that there is no imminent “evidence” that Iran has the “intentions or capabilities” of attacking the United States.
While it is quite true that America has been “war-weary” and over-extended in fighting overseas, the very reason behind this feeling lies in the fact that America, like all independent countries, prides itself on taking the necessary steps to defend its citizens and national interests. If there was evidence of Iranian “intentions and capabilities” of attacking America, instead of Israel, it is highly likely that the situation would be approached entirely differently. Furthermore, if diplomatic and economic sanctions no longer prove to be sufficient in hindering the Iranian regime’s heinous desire to “wipe out Israel” it may be time for the Israeli government to take whatever actions necessary to ensure that they, too, protect their citizens and national interests, with or without the “green light” from America.
Comment on this story
by Rachel Hirshfeld
On one of the most anticipated and media-hyped days of the American calendar, President Obama spoke to NBC’s Matt Lauer, just prior to the awaited NFL championship game.
The President, as has become customary on Super Bowl Sunday, gave an interview and attempted to answer some of the dominating questions distracting the public. Iran's nuclear ambitions and the anticipated response of both Israel and the United States remain daily headlines, as the Middle East may be best categorized, these days, as a region of unrest unpredictability.
In response to Lauer’s question regarding whether Israel has promised to give the United States advanced warning, in the event it decides to attack Iran, President Obama responded by saying, “You know, I won’t go into the details of our conversations. I will say we have closer military and intelligence consultation between our two countries than we ever have. And my number one priority continues to be the security of the United States, but also the security of Israel, and we are going to make sure that we work in lockstep as we proceed to try to solve this, hopefully diplomatically."
While it is expected that the two countries maintain close ties, it remains doubtful as to whether these ties result in a similar approach regarding Iran. The President continues to send ambiguous and irresolute messages on the subject, most probably in an attempt to keep and make as many friends as possible prior to the elections.
Commentary Magazine's Jonathan S. Tobin states that "while American diplomats travel the globe trying to corral other nations to support sanctions on Iran, American leaders have been open about their unwillingness to contemplate the use of force and horror at the thought Israel will act on its own."
NBC reported that “current and former U.S. and Israeli officials” with access to highly classified intelligence affirmed that, “[I]t is highly unlikely that the war-weary U.S. would mount a military attack on Iran, instead relying on financial sanctions and diplomatic pressure to squeeze Tehran.”
The Washington Post’s David Ignatius stated, after speaking with U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, that Obama and Panetta continue to tell Israel to refrain from launching a pre-emptive attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities because such an attack would “derail an increasingly successful international economic sanctions program and other non-military efforts to stop Iran from crossing the threshold.”
However, as Tobin notes, “The Israelis — and the Iranians — know the current sanctions program is nowhere close to stopping Iran.”
The president also said that there is no imminent “evidence” that Iran has the “intentions or capabilities” of attacking the United States.
While it is quite true that America has been “war-weary” and over-extended in fighting overseas, the very reason behind this feeling lies in the fact that America, like all independent countries, prides itself on taking the necessary steps to defend its citizens and national interests. If there was evidence of Iranian “intentions and capabilities” of attacking America, instead of Israel, it is highly likely that the situation would be approached entirely differently. Furthermore, if diplomatic and economic sanctions no longer prove to be sufficient in hindering the Iranian regime’s heinous desire to “wipe out Israel” it may be time for the Israeli government to take whatever actions necessary to ensure that they, too, protect their citizens and national interests, with or without the “green light” from America.
Tags: Leon Panetta ,President Obama ,Iran ,Israel ,sanction
More on this topic
-
Giuliani: Obama Has 'No Clue' What Is Going On in Middle East
-
Netanyahu's Visit to the US: A diplomatic warning?
-
PM Netanyahu: Only Strength Ensures Survival of Jewish People
-
Iran Ready to 'Stop Oil Exports to Europe'"
-
US Prof. Tells Newsweek Israel Must Attack Iran – Now
-
After Barbie, Iran Bans The Simpsons
Comment on this story
More Website News:
 |
Opinion: The Covert Meaning Behind the Headlines  |
|
|
Iran: Genocide a Moral Obligation |
|
|
US Prof. Tells Newsweek Israel Must Attack Iran – Now |
|
|
Canadian FM: Israel Has Every Right to Feel Threatened by Iran |
|
|
Carmel Fire Comptroller Report: Yishai Turning to Court |
