The European Union Times |
- Anti-Trump Bernie Sanders Crowd Flies Communist Flag During Chicago Protests
- “Donald Trump is Responsible” For Organized Chicago Violence - Opportunist Ted Cruz
- Trump cancels Chicago speech after Violent Democrats Hijack the Arena
- Bernie Sanders Openly Praising Fidel Castro, Trashing Freedom
- Thousands of Lifelong Democrats Jump to Trump in Mass Exodus
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2016 05:28 AM PST
I want to say I’m surprised, but I’m not. Anti-Trump protester is seen in the background of CNN’s live coverage holding up a Communist flag. I suppose since the left seems to forget the fact that Communism is responsible for more deaths than any other form of government, this guy will get some high fives among the Bernie Sanders crowd. Source |
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2016 04:48 AM PST
This is quite stunning even for a politician as low as Ted Cruz. Senator Cruz has a prime opportunity to highlight the intolerance of the left. Instead he choses to attack Donald Trump: At a media availability in Chicago, Ted Cruz basically blamed Donald Trump for the violence and protests that occurred earlier in the day at a Donald Trump rally at the University of Illinois-Chicago. The rally had to be cancelled due to safety concerns (link) Yes, Ted Cruz advocates the political equivalent of her skirt was too short, and she deserved to be raped for it. But Senator Ted Cruz wasn’t alone taking the opportunity to blame Donald Trump and praise the behavior of leftists, MoveOn.Org, Black Lives Matter, F**k The Police, Occupy Wall Street and professional Anarchists. Fox News pundits, led by Megyn Kelly, were quick with the narrative to pile on, claiming Donald Trump should reasonably accept the United States no longer allows freedom of association, and free speech should be curtailed in favor of inclusive, more politically sensitive, speech. After the anarchists were able to shut down the venue, a contingent of the organized faction moved to Trump Tower where they stood and cursed at families entering and exiting the hotel. Source |
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2016 04:21 AM PST
Violent democrats, most of whom were members of the infamous Black Lives Matter sponsored by globalist Jewish billionaire George Soros, hijacked the arena where GOP frontrunner Donal Trump was scheduled to hold a speech to thousands of supporters. The democrats who did the riots in and outside the arena were mostly formed out of Muslims, communist African Americans and a couple of white libtards with dreadlocks and with no brains whatsoever. The protesters were extremely violent and hard to contain by the police. Chicago Police along with Trump’s secret service team advised the Republican frontrunner that it would be for the best to cancel the event due to serious threat of escalating into a full revolution between Trump’s supporters and the libtarded democrats who despite carrying “peace” signs, were extremely violent. The security concern was so high that the whole thing could have ended up with people being killed on both sides. The democrat protesters were shouting “Bernie 2016” among other things, clearly showing that they were communist Bernie Sanders supporters. Outside the arena members of the Black Lives Matter movement were having fierce verbal clashes with Trump’s black supporters, trying to convince black people who support Donald Trump, that they shouldn’t support Trump anymore because Trump is a “racist evil nazi endorsed by the KKK who wants to deport Mexicans and Muslims”. They were also telling Trump’s black supporters that they should be voting for Bernie Sanders solely because the BLM support Bernie and Trump’s black supporters shouldn’t “betray them” because “look at this skin, I’m black you’re black, you should do as I say, not as Trump says!”. Trump’s black supporters weren’t buying at all into this whole race baiting tactics, with each and every single one of them firmly holding their ground and making a case against the lunatic BLM Bernie Sanders supporters. Most of Trump’s supporters were bringing intelligent and relative arguments into the discussion, saying things like “I don’t need the democrats, I don’t need Bernie to give me handouts! I want to have a job! I want to work and earn my own living!” BLM were replying “then go get a job, whose stopping you? you don’t need to hate, we blacks are being killed by racist white cops and Trump is a racist too!” Trump supporters fired back saying “that’s all you do, you talk about race! this is not about race, our jobs are taken away by China, I can’t get a job anywhere because they were all outsourced to China, your democrat leaders who you support have all betrayed us, what did they ever do to us?” BLM continued with their non-arguments saying that they shouldn’t vote and support Trump because he’s white and hes racist. Sure! When you don’t have an argument to answer to straight out facts, just throw in some socialist words like “racist, nazis, xenophobe, bigot, islamophobe, antisemite”, etc. whatever, there are tons of socialist words to chose from. In the below video there is a BLM member wearing a Guy Fawkes mask saying to a black Trump supporter “my brother” dozens of times, despite the two having totally different political views. The BLM member thought that Trump guy is his “brother” just because he is black. Now if that isn’t racism, then I don’t know what is! BLM movement is openly a racist organization no different than the KKK and just as KKK became a slander term, so should BLM become a slander term in a normal rational society. Despite BLM’s massive celebration on Twitter touting the entire skirmish as a “victory” there wasn’t a single Trump supporter, black or white, converted by them. None said that after this they will no longer vote for Trump. In fact most of Trump’s supporters who were interviewed and polled said that they feel stronger for Trump after these riots because “they feel insulted by the democrats who undermine them and the choice that they made” while others said that they feel exactly the same for Trump, neither stronger nor weaker, simply unhinged after the entire thing. So the logical question that comes into mind is what do all of those violent socialist morons hope to achieve with their protests? Not shocking at all was the establishment mainstream media which immediately came out in support for BLM and bashed Trump with the exception of Sean Hannity whose career at FOX News is a complete mystery of why he wasn’t fired a long time ago for being so anti-establishment and so fair and well balanced in general compared to the other pundis. It is now time for Trump’s supporters to do the same to Democrats! Infiltrate their speeches and go berserk, riot, protest, shout “communist scum, red scum, NWO globalist” to both Bernie and Hillary or whatever you find appropriate. Let them have a taste of their own medicine. |
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2016 03:16 AM PST
Ah, the million dollar question. The difference between Bernie Sanders’ brand of socialism and Fidel Castro’s brand of socialism? Not even Bernie Sanders knows the difference. No seriously. They tried to get him to explain. Is this Bernie Sander’s “David Duke” moment? When asked to differentiate his brand of social from the communist leader Fidel Castro, Sanders had little to say. The Univision/CNN/Facebook debate featured video of then Mayor Sanders explaining why he believed the Cuban people had not staged an insurrection against Cuba, and why then President Ronald Reagan was wrong to think that Nicaraguans would do the same against the leftist government there. “They had forgotten that he educated their kids, gave them health care,” he said in the video, adding that the Castros had “totally transformed their society” but also qualifying his statement “You know, not to say that Fidel Castro or Cuba are perfect, they are certainly not.” “In South Florida there are still open wounds among some exiles regarding socialism and communism. So please explain what is the difference between the socialism that you profess and the socialism in Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela,” Univision anchor María Elena Salinas asked. Sanders got two chances to divorce his “democratic socialist” label from 1960s Cuban communism. At first he focused on the failures of U.S. intervention in Latin America, and historical support for regime change towards brutal dictatorships. But he didn’t really answer the question. Then the moderator gave him another shot. Well, this shouldn’t come as a surprise. Unfortunately, to Bernie supporters it won’t matter. For them, these kind of revealing videos and answers are met with a never-ending shuffle of “nuh-uh!” We’ve watched as they’ve argued up and down that “NAZIs (National Socialist German Workers’ Party)” were in fact not socialist at all, but that they were really right-wing. Or something. Ignore the “Socialist” in the name. Pivoting, Bernie and his supporters emphatically made the argument that socialism works really well in Scandinavian countries, like Denmark. Then the Prime Minister of Denmark told them to shut up, because Denmark is not socialist. Then we watched Bernie supporters claim that “Democratic Socialism” is some new brand of socialism, one that hasn’t really been tried before, but they’re pretty sure will work really well. Now with this Castro video, that’s going to be a tough position to defend. So just expect them to throw their hands up and say “Whatever, Castro isn’t all that bad, and I want socialism. Period.” Oh and about that “Castro educating the people” bit. Cubans cannot watch or listen to independent, private, or foreign broadcasts.[17] In 1963, using Soviet-supplied equipment, Cuba became the first nation in the Western Hemisphere to jam radio broadcasts, the apparent targets being the anti-Castro stations in the US.[18] In 2006, Cuba jammed Radio Republica, a clandestine broadcast to Cuba on 7205 kHz.[19] The output of the Television Network teleSUR in Cuba is subject to various restrictions.[20][21] Cubans cannot read books, magazines or newspapers unless they have been approved/published by the government.[17] Cubans can not receive publications from abroad or from visitors.[17] I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: Bernie Sanders is a fascist. Source |
|
Posted: 12 Mar 2016 01:55 AM PST
Over 46,000 Pennsylvania Democrats have switched parties to vote for Donald Trump, joining thousands of other lifelong Democrats in blue states doing the exact same thing. In Massachusetts alone, at least 20,000 Democrats have defected to support Trump and another 1,000 blue-collar Ohio Democrats are also jumping ship to Trump, and no Republican president has ever won the White House without Ohio. The movement, called “Ditch and Switch,” was promoted in Sept. by the YouTube duo Diamond and Silk and explains why Trump is winning so many open primary states where voters don’t have register as Republicans to cast GOP ballots. “For many years the Democratic Party has promoted agendas that most Americans did not agree with,” Diamond and Silk declared in a video. “Our country is deeply divided, and the silent majority has been bullied into silence by political posturing and underhanded agendas that favor the few while excluding the majority.” The last time a similar movement erupted was likely during the 1980 presidential race when switchover Democrats helped propel Ronald Reagan into the oval office. “The labor unions, who usually support the Democrats, a lot of our members, and a lot of their families, are supporting Trump,” said Keith Strobelt with the United Steelworkers local union in Canton, Ohio. “It could be that several hundred of our members will back Trump.” “A lot find him refreshing. He says a lot of things they say around their dinner tables.” And that’s scaring Democratic Party leaders. “Trump put together a coalition in Massachusetts that elects Democratic governors,” Democratic strategist Mary Anne Marsh said, pointing out that Trump has won big in blue-collar, union cities across the rust belt. “He won among Catholics, a week after picking a fight with the Pope.” “I absolutely think he can put the rust belt into play.” Source |