 |
|---|
 |
|
August 12, 2012 Best of TomDispatch: Noam Chomsky, Who Owns the World?
[Note for TomDispatch Readers: Check out our special Noam Chomsky book offer at the TomDispatch donation page. For $125, you can have a signed copy of Chomsky’s book Hopes and Prospects and, through your support in the dog days of the hottest American summer
on record, do this site a world of good. After all, we rely on you to
keep us going even in the summer, which means a special thanks to those
of you who have already donated! In addition, check out the latest review of the initial offering from Dispatch Books, Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050, by Nick Turse and me. It’s over at American Conservative Magazine,
demonstrating that this site appeals to critics of American imperial
power across the political spectrum. It is also available, personalized
and autographed, at our donation page. Tom]
In Noam Chomsky’s “Who Owns the World?” -- the most popular TomDispatch post of all time (which means the last 10 years) -- he wrote of one key imperial principle: “The U.S. cannot tolerate ‘any exercise of sovereignty’ that interferes with its global designs.” Hence, the under-reported but staggering U.S. build-up in the Persian Gulf. Of late, most “build-up” publicity has gone to the Obama administration’s “pivot” to Asia (to “contain” China), including an announcement that 60% of U.S. naval power will sooner or later be deployed to Asian waters. But much of this remains a promise for the future. The real “pivot” focus of the moment, if it can even be called that after all these years, remains Iran. That country is largely surrounded by American military bases continually being built up, including a new missile defense radar station at a secret site in Qatar, part of a developing U.S. regional anti-missile system. In addition, there is an ongoing build-up of U.S. commando forces; of the military power of U.S. regional allies, thanks to new weapons systems of all sorts regularly being put on offer by Washington; of U.S. naval forces in the Persian Gulf, already enormous and still growing, including not one but two aircraft carrier battle groups, minesweepers, a new “floating base” for possible special operations forces, and tiny drone submersibles being “rushed” to the region. And don’t forget a similarly large-scale build-up of U.S. air power, including the deployment of the most advanced U.S. fighter plane, the F-22, to a base in the United Arab Emirates. Add this to a series of warlike acts, including ever-tightening oil sanctions against Iran, the release of cyber worms meant to infect Iranian computer systems connected to its nuclear program, and an evident Israeli campaign to assassinate Iranian nuclear scientists, and you have quite a “pivot” in what is, let’s not forget, the oil heartlands of the planet. Much of this is being covered in a scattered, almost absentminded way in the mainstream media. Yet anyone familiar with how World War I began knows that massive military build-ups or mobilizations -- and a rickety Iranian regime is doing its best to respond regionally with its own mini-military build-up -- can lead to war, whether either side actually intends it or not. A U.S. ship recently firing on an Indian boat -- and killing one fisherman -- near Iran is a reminder of where such inherently trigger-happy situations can lead. Add to all this the fact that the planet’s former self-proclaimed “sole superpower” is visibly decaying and increasingly desperate to maintain its pretensions to global dominance, and you have a formula for future disaster. Isn’t it sad in its own way that Chomsky’s piece, first posted at this site in April 2011 (like the 2004 Chalmers Johnson piece reposted last Sunday), is in no way outmoded? It’s not faintly ready for the dustbin of history, and in fact, it remains ahead of its moment. In this sense, the United States is a Chomskyan nation, eerily following the path he’s laid out for it and so, undoubtedly, heading for something ugly indeed. Tom Is the World Too Big to Fail? |
