Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Thursday, 28 June 2012


TomDispatch.com: A Regular Antidote to the Mainstream Media
June 28, 2012
Tomgram: Nan Levinson, Moral Injury and American War
[Note for TomDispatch Readers:  With today’s post, TomDispatch is closing until July 5th.  By the way, I recently asked you to consider writing friends, colleagues, relatives -- whomever -- and urge them to go to the "subscribe" window at the upper right of TD's main screen, put in their email addresses, hit “submit,” answer the “opt-in” email that instantly arrives in your email box (or, unfortunately, spam folder), and receive notices whenever a new post goes up. (Word of mouth is, of course, still the major kind of publicity this site can afford.) A number of you did so and TD is getting a nice stream of new subscribers. Many thanks indeed! If some of you meant to do this but didn't quite get around to it, now's as perfect a time as any! And it really does make a difference to us.

Similarly, as summer begins, those of you in a giving mood shouldn’t forget TomDispatch.  You really do help keep us turning out something close to 150 well-edited, provocative, original posts a year with only the rare week off.  For our small crew, that’s an undertaking, believe me.  Check out our donation page by clicking here.  Remember that, for contributions of $75 (or more), you can get personalized signed copies of our newest book, Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare: 2001-2050, or my book The United States of Fear.  Or simply click on any TomDispatch book link, buy either of those books or anything else at Amazon and you’ve also made a contribution to us.  We get a small percentage of your purchase price at no cost to you. Thanks again!  See you in a week.  Tom]

“It's a day of picnics and patriotic parades, a night of concerts and fireworks, and a reason to fly the American flag.”  That, at least, is how the federal government describes July 4th on its official website, USA.gov.  “Independence Day,” it tells us, “honors the birthday of the United States of America and the adoption of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776.”

As you may recall, however foggily, from grammar school social studies classes, that document struck a decidedly anti-military tone, castigating America’s then-ruler for having:


“kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

“He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

“He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

“For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us.”

Today, of course, America’s rulers have saddled the country with a large standing army, created an exceptionally powerful military establishment largely divorced from civilian life, created secret laws and enforced abridgments of basic civil liberties while quartering among us, at military bases all over America, large bodies of troops.

Given these developments, it’s hardly surprising that, over the years, the signing of this country’s foundational document as it was launching its anti-colonial War of Independence has somehow been wrapped in “warrior” values that go with the neo-colonial wars we have been fighting in distant lands.  In fact, Independence Day has become prime-time for military recruiting.  The Navy’s high-flying Blue Angels, for example, are taking their aerial acrobatics to the skies above Boston Harbor as part of this July 4th’s festivities.  Meanwhile, the “Golden Knights,” the Army’s trick parachute team, will dramatically descend on celebrations in St. Louis.  It’s military à go-go all day long.

With so many martial myths afoot, the time seems ripe for a candid discussion of the troops we’re so often called upon to “support” on July 4th and every other day of the year.  In her first piece for TomDispatch, journalist Nan Levinson examines the veterans of our post-9/11 wars, their “sacred wounds,” “moral injuries,” and just what America’s uniformed sons and daughters have experienced during the last decade of far-flung occupations.  With new military interventions blossoming all the time, the subjects she raises ought to be at the forefront of American minds.  If U.S. troops find themselves morally injured, shouldn’t we ask: Who put them in the position to suffer such wounds in the first place? Nick Turse
Mad, Bad, Sad 
What’s Really Happened to America’s Soldiers

By Nan Levinson
"PTSD is going to color everything you write," came the warning from a stepmother of a Marine, a woman who keeps track of such things.  That was in 2005, when post-traumatic stress disorder, a.k.a. PTSD, wasn't getting much attention, but soon it was pretty much all anyone wrote about.  Story upon story about the damage done to our guys in uniform -- drinking, divorce, depression, destitution -- a laundry list of miseries and victimhood.  When it comes to veterans, it seems like the only response we can imagine is to feel sorry for them.
Victim is one of the two roles we allow our soldiers and veterans (the other is, of course, hero), but most don't have PTSD, and this isn't one of those stories.
Civilian to the core, I've escaped any firsthand experience of war, but I've spent the past seven years talking with current GIs and recent veterans, and among the many things they've taught me is that nobody gets out of war unmarked.  That’s especially true when your war turns out to be a shadowy, relentless occupation of a distant land, which requires you to do things that you regret and that continue to haunt you.
Click here to read more of this dispatch.