http://rt.com/politics/russia-us-missile-defense-shield-486/
RT
June 9, 2012
US missile shield may provide ‘false sense of security’
Robert Bridge
====
"The European missile defense system is certainly designed not to defend
from a mythical missile threat on the part of Iran and North Korea, but
from what Western politicians believe could be a possible attack by
Russian ballistic missiles. Any NATO military plans classify the Russian
nuclear missile potential as posing a threat to the alliance, which
envisions certain measures to neutralize (Russia’s nuclear defense
forces)."
====
The deployment of a global missile defense system by the United States
and NATO undermines strategic stability in the world and prompts Moscow
to take appropriate steps in response, says a leading Russian engineer.
Yury Zaitsev, an advisor at the Academy of Engineering Sciences, told
reporters on Saturday that as long as the Americans continue to pursue a
global missile defense system, the idea of strategic stability does not
exist.
"While the US is planning to set up a missile defense system without any
limitations, you can forget about strategic stability forever," Zaitsev
said. "Russia is going to find itself surrounded by a belt of NATO
interceptor missiles along its western borders.”
In light of these developments, the specialist said that Russia’s plans
to deploy tactical missile systems near the NATO borders are “absolutely
justified."
"The same thing concerns the creation of other forces and systems
capable of destroying or disabling missile defense systems on the
territories of neighboring states," he added.
NATO announced at its Chicago summit in May that an interim European
missile defense system is already on line, and that the alliance is
determined to proceed with its expansion until it fully realizes the
system's potential.
Meanwhile, at the same time that US and NATO officials declare that the
missile defense system is not targeted against Russia, their actual
steps are proving the opposite, Zaitsev said.
"The European missile defense system is certainly designed not to defend
from a mythical missile threat on the part of Iran and North Korea, but
from what Western politicians believe could be a possible attack by
Russian ballistic missiles," he said. "Any NATO military plans classify
the Russian nuclear missile potential as posing a threat to the
alliance, which envisions certain measures to neutralize (Russia’s
nuclear defense forces)."
The Russian specialist said that it is possible that the missile defense
system may give some politicians a false sense of security, possibly
resulting in potential adversaries “dictating their terms” to Russia.
"No one can guarantee that there will not be politicians with the
illusion of a reliable missile shield over their heads and, being sure
of their security, wanting to dictate their terms to Russia," Zaitsev
said.
In such a situation, it makes no sense to demand legal guarantees that
the system will not be targeted against Russia, he stressed.
"Even if such guarantees are issued, they will only serve to lull
Moscow, and then they will retract these guarantees just as easily,”
Zaitsev said.
“Suffice it to recall how prominent Western politicians swore that,
following Germany's reunification, NATO would not move eastward even by
an inch."
America’s determination to build a missile defense system in former
Warsaw Pact territory represents the main stumbling block in relations
between Russia and the US, Zaitsev explained.
He insisted that the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which former US
President George W. Bush walked away from in late 2001, maintained
strategic global stability precisely because it limited the deployment
and modernization of missile defense systems. At the same time, the
treaty provided opportunities to negotiate the reduction of strategic
offensive weapons.