SATURDAY 9TH FEBRUARY 2013
Russia preparing for future psychotronic wars?
BY
EDITOR
– SEPTEMBER 3, 2012POSTED IN: FEATURED STORIES, LATEST HEADLINES, VIEWS
By Daniel Salgar Antolinez
This article originally appeared in El Spectador and was translated by Rudy Andria. Author’s permission received.
This article originally appeared in El Spectador and was translated by Rudy Andria. Author’s permission received.
Weapons that attack by waves and leave no traces will decide armed conflicts after the nuclear age.
The development of psychotronic weapons – wave devices controlling thoughts, feelings and behavior of human beings – has garnered much speculation over the past 5o years. But recently, Russian President Vladimir Putin endorsed a psychotronic weapons program, suggesting that their development has not been stopped and that Russia is preparing for future wars.
In an article published in Russian dailyRossiskaya Gazeta Putin said: “the military capability of a country in space or information countermeasures, especially in cyberspace, will play a great, if not decisive, role in determining the nature of an armed conflict. In the more distant future, weapons systems based on new principles (beam, geophysical, wave, genetic, psychophysical and other technology) will be developed. All this will, in addition to nuclear weapons, provide entirely new instruments for achieving political and strategic goals”.
The article continued by outlining further proposals for Russia’s national security.
The president also stated that these weapons will be comparable in effect to nuclear weapons, but “will be more acceptable in terms of military and political ideology” . Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov added that Moscow will create an advanced military research agency similar to the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).
Earlier this year Putin announced that $ 710 billion dollars would be invested in military development for the coming decade .
The Russian state has had a long-standing interest in this type of technology. Mojmir Babacek, a Czech author, researcher founder of the International Movement Against Manipulation of Central Nervous System, tells El Spectador that Russia began to investigate phenomena such as telepathy, telekinesis and clairvoyance as early as 1920. The goal was to find the physical elements that govern mental function. Russian scientists talked about torsion fields and the Americans about scalar fields.
Why did Putin describe these weapons as ‘more acceptable in the military and political ideology’? For Babacek, those who would use them might be less “culpable” because the use of psychotronic weapons leaves no radioactivity, as happens with nuclear weapons. If the technology is not used to kill enemies but to make them “incapable of fighting, by overheating their bodies, knocking them unconscious, making them sick by causing them pain in their internal organs or epileptic seizures, he believes that states which use such technology may argue that they are waging war in a more humane way. However, Babacek cautions that the use of this technology could turn them into totalitarian powers of a new type.’
Dr John Hall, a physician and author of ‘A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America’ treats alleged victims of electronic harassment, stalking, and mind control. Dr Hall told El Spectador that psychotronic weapons send waves in the electromagnetic spectrum to the human nervous system to alter behavior, thought, perception, and the musculoskeletal system, ” victims see holograms, hear voices, have involuntary muscle movements and headaches.”
Another aspect of a psychotronic war, says Hall, is that there is no known protection that works consistently against these weapons. “The obvious goal is to control a global population without using violence.” At least not violence in the form of bullets, missiles and bombs, as we know it nowadays.
Many governments have denied that they are in possession of psychotronic weapons claiming only that those weapons are under development. Babacek, along with a vast number of authors, scientists and researchers says that based on scientific literature and leaked information, there is strong evidence to suggest that such weapons exist, though it is impossible to prove whether they have been used.
An article published in 2007 by the Washington Post reported the findings of US Air Force experiments, obtained through Freedom of Information request, which claimed that in 1994, scientists were able to transmit phrases into the heads of human subjects, albeit with marginal intelligibility.
Campaigners say that one of the biggest challenges is that psychotronic weapons leave no evidence. Cheryl Welsh, Mind Justice director, told this newspaper that the fact that the weapons “are operated by remote control and do not leave a bullet or trail of evidence” makes their use too complicated to be detected. Many who claim to be victims of these technologies are usually classified as mentally ill… the weapons system is designed to mimic symptoms of common diseases, schizophrenia or hallucinations.”
A report published in 2000 by the European Parliament examined ’detailed technical data on existing weapons and those which now lie on the horizon. It also seeks to examine the extent to which certain of these weapons are intrinsically abusable …. ‘
‘…These devices include weapons using chemical, optical, kinetic impact, electroshock, directed
energy beam, sticky foam, radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human
targets. Open source documentation is presented to evaluate both the official justification for deploying
such technologies and whether or not commercial pressures may lead to uncontrolled proliferation of
such systems into the hands of human rights violators.’
energy beam, sticky foam, radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human
targets. Open source documentation is presented to evaluate both the official justification for deploying
such technologies and whether or not commercial pressures may lead to uncontrolled proliferation of
such systems into the hands of human rights violators.’
- Share
