Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Friday 30 May 2014

The European Union Times



Posted: 29 May 2014 03:10 PM PDT

A stunning report prepared by the Ministry of Energy (MoE) on the recently signed agreements between Russian state-owned oil company RosneftExxon Mobil Corporation and British Petroleum says that additional memorandums of understanding (MoU) agreed upon by these three global energy giants allows for the deployment of tens-of-thousands of Russian military forces to protect their “mutual vital interests” in the Americas should they come under attack by Obama regime forces.
According to this report, these new agreements were signed last week at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) where President Putin declared: “The challenges in the energy sector are clearly of global nature, and we can only meet them together, by means of co-operation. It is important that this is exactly what the major companies are doing.”
These agreements were made despite the Obama regime and EU sanctions imposed on Russia and on Rosneft CEO Igor Sechinover the Russian annexation of Crimea, this report notes, and clearly shows that these multinational energy giants are now operating independently of any sovereign government.
The MoU’s attached to these agreements, this report continues, notes the Obama regimes continued “war on oil” that has caused petrol (gasoline) prices to rise to historic levels throughout the world while at the same time equally historic new oil finds have been made.
Another factor being added into these MoU’s, this report says, has been the Obama regimes continued stalling the completion of the Keystone XL Pipeline projects northern leg which is further adding to the artificial increase of petrol prices in the United States.
Being feared most by the Obama regime and its oligarch supporters, this report notes, is that the ever growing world “oil glut” may push the global economy into deflation, which would effectively destroy the Western banking system, but at the same time greatly benefit the lower and middle classes by giving them the lowest energy prices many of them have seen in their lifetime.
And as, perhaps, best explained by London’s Telegraph News Service:
“One piece of the jigsaw puzzle is missing to complete the deflation landscape across the West: a slide in oil prices. This is becoming more likely each month.
Turmoil across the Middle East and parts of Africa has choked supply over the past two years, keeping Brent crude near $110 a barrel despite a broader commodity slump. Cotton and corn prices have halved, as has the UBS index of industrial metals. Such anomalies rarely last.
“We estimate that crude oil is now the mostly richly priced commodity in the world,” says Deutsche Bank in a fresh report.
Michael Lewis, the bank’s commodity strategist, said markets face an “new oil supply glut” as three forces combine. US shale will add 1m barrels a day (b/d) to global supply for the third year running; Libya will crank up shipments after a near collapse in 2013; and Iran will come out of hibernation. “This will push OPEC spare capacity to levels last seen in the depths of the financial crisis in 2009,” he said.
America is on track to overtake Saudi Arabia as the top global producer of oil by 2016. It will account for more than half of non-OPEC world supply this year. The US Energy Department says US oil imports will drop to 5.5m b/d by next year, half the level a decade ago. This turns the world’s 89m b/d market upside-down.
Deutsche Bank said Saudi Arabia may have to slash its output by a quarter to 7.5m b/d this year to stop the bottom falling out of the market. The Saudis no longer have such money to spare. They are propping up an elephantine welfare nexus to keep a lid on explosive tensions in the Eastern Province, home to Saudi oil and its aggrieved Shia minority. A cut of this size would push the budget into deep deficit.
This comes as Iran makes its peace with the West. Its 30-year vendetta with US – Iran’s natural ally in many ways – no longer makes sense. Bank of America says a simultaneous return of Iran and Libya could add up to 3m b/d. Just a third of this “positive supply shock” could shave $20 off the world oil price.”
Most feared by global energy giants, however, this report continues, are the “deadly lengths” the Obama regime will go through to keep oil prices artificially high, and which include last weeks CIA-backed coup attempt in Libya which (of course) prevents Libyan oil from reaching its fullest capacity.
In seeking to prevent the Obama regime from attacking the “mutual vital interests” of Rosneft-Exxon Mobil Corporation-British Petroleum like they have in Syria, Libya and now Ukraine, this report further explains, was the main reason behindDefense Minister Sergei Shoigu engaging in talks with Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Algeria, Cyprus, the Seychelles, Vietnam and Singapore this past February to expand Russian military forces to these critical energy regions.
And in the most explicit MoU agreed upon by these global energy giants, the MoE states Russian military forces are to be allowed “total and unimpeded access” to all of their facilities (either jointly or separately owned) in the Americas (North-Central-South) should they come under “attack or threat of attack” by the Obama regime or its allies.
This report grimly notes too, that in order to fulfill its obligations under these MoU’s, and at its “most extreme”, they could possibly involve the use of tens-of-thousands of Russian military forces in the American region, which includes Rosneft’s access to its fields in North America and the Gulf of Mexico, along with Rosneft-Exxon Mobil fields in the Arctic and Black Sea…and, in essence, means both Exxon Mobil and British Petroleum are giving their backing to the deployment of Russian forces in the Americas.
Source
        
Posted: 29 May 2014 02:55 PM PDT

A group of Orthodox Christian activists claim that they have gathered 100,000 signatures under a petition seeking to completely ban abortions in Russia, a number enough to make it a valid legislative initiative.
In the near future all the documents will be submitted to the authorities and the activists will be waiting for an official reaction to their demands, a member of the Public Chamber, priest Aleksander Pelin was quoted as saying by the ITAR-TASS news agency.
The leader of the activists, Dmitriy Tsorionov elaborated on the initiative, and said that it seeks a complete legislative ban on all abortions, including those made on medical advice and on all abortive means of contraception, such as intrauterine devices and hormonal pills. Tsorionov said his group was not protesting against barrier contraceptives, such as condoms.
According to Russian Law any petition that gathers at least 100,000 signatures of support becomes a draft law and must be considered by parliament. The signatures must be gathered on the special government portal and come from registered Russian citizens. People can also vote against the initiatives on the same portal, but the votes against do not influence the documents’ movement, at least technically.
Since the scheme was introduced in March last year only three initiatives have reached the 100,000 signature threshold. The first suggested a price limit for cars purchased by state agencies, and the second called to abolish a new law targeting internet piracy. They were rejected at the first stage. The third sought changes in the rules of self defense favoring the gun lobby, and it is still being considered by an expert group.
Abortions are legal in Russia and have been since Soviet times, but currently centrist-conservative lawmakers want to limit or completely ban them, saying it is partly responsible for the country’s dwindling population.
The head of the parliamentary committee for family, women and children, Yelena Mizulina told a recent parliamentary conference that the number of teenage abortions in 2013 was almost 12,000 and there were serious fears that many of the girls could be left infertile forever. The MP blamed the current Family Code and the Law on Healthcare for the situation, in particular the rule that allows abortions without parents’ consent from the age of 15.
The total number of abortions in Russia is about one million per year, according to Deputy Health Minister Tatyana Yakovleva.
In early October last year an official representative of the Russian Orthodox Church attacked abortions and surrogacy as “mutiny against God”, and less than a month later lawmaker Mizulina said in a public address that the community must urgently stop tolerating abortions and surrogacy as they threaten to wipe out the population of Russia, and the world as a whole.
The move gained little support from other politicians and shortly afterwards Mizulina played down her statements saying that she wanted to draw attention to the problem and start a discussion, not introduce any legislative limitations.
Source
        
Posted: 29 May 2014 02:34 PM PDT
Bilderberg members peering down on protesters from their 5-star Marriott hotel in Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thursday, May 29 marks the start of the Bilderberg conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. Most media outlets, with the exception of a handful of alternative media sites and The Guardian, will ignore the event. Infowars, however, will put the globalist event and its secretive agenda front and center.
Our on-the-ground team in Denmark will use social media to bring you the latest information and developments on the three day event. Exclusive news and interviews will be aired on the Alex Jones Show. In addition to live coverage, Infowars.com features live and archival video from Copenhagen.
Alex has put up a web page where all Infowars.com stories and videos will appear. You can get to it here:http://www.infowars.com/b/
In addition, breaking news will be tweeted out over Alex’s twitter, here: https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones
Additional coverage is also available on the PrisonPlanetLive Youtube page.
For a partial list of the wealthy globalists attending the Bilderberg Meetings you could check Wikipedia. Of course not everyone is mentioned in the list but most of them are there.




        
Posted: 29 May 2014 01:17 PM PDT

The 74 year-old German President, Joachim Gauck, has called on Germany to accept more of the policies that are causing Germans to become a minority in their own nation.
“Our country needs immigration,” Gauck said at Bellevue Palace, according to Spiegel.de. “We do not lose if we accept diversity.” [...] “a great distance has already been covered.” [...] “[however] all the side effects of immigration do not please everyone.”
He lamented the German people’s feelings towards immigrants: “A young woman from a Vietnamese family is accepted in the United States or in the UK as American or British. In contrast, Germany [often questions if immigrants really are German]” he said.
Gauck was at least honest enough to admit that immigrants do have their problems: “ghetto education, youth crime, patriarchal world views, homophobia, living off welfare, and truants.”
“There can be no mitigating circumstances given for [immigrant's cultural customs] that are contrary to our laws.”
“[Tolerance] demands a lot from all of us: from those who arrive, and from those who need to open up to immigrants” [...] “Being open is exhausting.”
“It matters not where immigrants come from and how they came – in the boat across the Mediterranean, or in the business class from overseas, as students, or as the family members of migrants: they are all now at home in Germany. This fills me with gratitude and joy,” Gauck said.
Germany is behind in “diversity”, compared to France, Sweden, or Britain, which is surprising because World War 2 is constantly used to beat Germans into a corner on just about any subject. It remains 95% White, whereas similar neighboring countries like the UK is 87% White, and France was estimated around 85% White in 2004.
Communists will no doubt be out in number to support President Gauck’s agenda, they love anything that results in multiculturalism.
Only European countries are expected to have all these destructive policies. Moving millions of non-European immigrants into Europe and then forcing everyone to accept a certain amount of immigrants will inevitably lead to a European minority, not only in the country at large, but in every area White people used to be the majority.
“There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th century idea and we are trying to transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.” – Wesley Clark, U.S. general.
        
Posted: 29 May 2014 12:42 PM PDT

Saudi Arabia’s Health Ministry has recorded 13 more deaths from the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in the kingdom.
The ministry said on Wednesday that a total of 186 have died from the virus since it first appeared in the country in 2012.
It added that some 565 people had contracted the virus in Saudi Arabia.
MERS is a cousin of SARS. The former virus first emerged in the Middle East and was discovered in September 2012 in a Qatari man who had traveled to Saudi Arabia.
The virus, which causes coughing, fever and pneumonia, does not appear to be as contagious as SARS, which infected some 8,273 people and killed about 10 percent of them.
The World Health Organization (WHO) said earlier this month that the spread of the disease has become more serious, but does not yet constitute a global health emergency.
The WHO asked governments to make sure the necessary measures were implemented in all healthcare facilities in order to contain the infection.
In addition to Saudi Arabia, hit by the virus the worst MERS has been reported in 16 other countries including some Persian Gulf states, France, Germany, Italy, Tunisia and Britain.
According to a study, the virus has been “extraordinarily common” in camels for at least two decades, and may have been passed directly from animals to humans.
Source
        
Posted: 29 May 2014 10:19 AM PDT

A federal appeals court has ruled that Americans have the right to videotape police officers in public, thereby allowing a court case brought against New Hampshire police to progress.
Carla Gericke was arrested in 2010 for videotaping members of the Weare Police Department who pulled over her friend during a traffic stop. Her video camera malfunctioned, however, and she failed to record evidence of the incident.
Nevertheless, Gericke was arrested for disobeying a police officer, obstructing a government official, and “unlawful interception of oral communications,” the court said. Concerning her failed efforts to record the incident, the court noted that the malfunction was irrelevant: “We agree that Gericke’s First Amendment right does not depend on whether her attempt to videotape was frustrated by a technical malfunction. There is no dispute that she took out the camera in order to record the traffic stop.”
Although Carla Gericke was never brought to trial, she subsequently sued the Town of Weare, its police department, and the officers who arrested and charged her, alleging in pertinent part that the “wiretapping charge constituted retaliatory prosecution in violation of her First Amendment rights,” according to the appeal statement.
The police officers involved in her arrest argued they should be immune from a lawsuit.
The First US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Gericke “was exercising a clearly established First Amendment right when she attempted to film the traffic stop in the absence of a police order to stop filming or leave the area.”
“It is clearly established in this circuit that police officers cannot, consistently with the Constitution, prosecute citizens for violating wiretapping laws when they peacefully record a police officer performing his or her official duties in a public area,” the appeals court said.
The First Circuit covers Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island and sent the case back to a lower court for trial.
The ruling allows her lawsuit to proceed.
The decision comes amid a flurry of court cases involving citizens attempting to express their First Amendment rights by filming their encounters with law enforcement officers, many of whom say the recordings interfere with their work, to say nothing of the possibility that a camera may be mistaken for a weapon.
Earlier this month, a Massachusetts woman was charged with using a concealed mobile phone allegedly in violation of state wiretapping regulations to audio-record her own arrest.
According to Massachusetts law, citizens are permitted to record police officers in public, but only if the police have been informed that a recording is taking place.
Source