Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Friday, 6 June 2014

The European Union Times


Posted: 05 Jun 2014 07:52 AM PDT


As tensions between the U.S. and Russia remain at an all time high comparable to that of the Cold War, it seems that strong-armed Putin has had just about enough of Obama’s petty nuisances. Several analysts have recently speculated that to put Obama in his place once and for all, Putin was set to release evidence (i.e. satellite imagery) in his position that revealed the 9/11 terror attacks as an inside job.
These so called “inside jobs” are better known as false-flag attacks in which they were specifically and strategically designed so as to deceive the public into thinking something that isn’t true. In other words, U.S. officials would plan and execute an attack on America and its people that would look as though a certain enemy entity had carried out the atrocity.
This is only the case when America has proven interests in the homeland of the attributed group. As many have explained before, from both sides of the aisle, the United States had a heavy oil interest and is thought to have been the motive for the alleged false flag attacks.
Several documented cases have been exposed showing that this would be nothing new in the military realm of America in the pursuit of selfish interest. That being the case, it appears as though the rest of the world is growing tired of the impact America is having as it carries out its agenda.
In an effort to expose the government for what it is doing – killing Americans in an effort to invade elsewhere, and then killing nationals wherever they go – some have threatened to leak military details exposing America’s atrocities. The most recent of speculation has fallen upon Putin as he is said to have certain satellite images that prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that America was complicit in a false flag attack.
Supposedly demonstrating that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by American officials – well, you could imagine the repercussions. All faith and trust in government would disintegrate, riots would break out in the streets and perhaps a civil uprising would commence.
That being said, imagine what America would look like upon the world stage. An easy target for Muslim extremists or maybe a takeover by a foreign competing superpower? Although these scenarios may be a stretch, you could see how other forces could easily take advantage of such a situation.
What do you guys think – could Putin have such evidence in his possession? Could this be why Obama has gone so soft on Putin throughout the past month – perhaps he was blackmailed? Let us know what you think of this in a comment below.
Source
        
Posted: 05 Jun 2014 07:14 AM PDT

We find it interesting, therefore, that the Australian government’s limit on mercury in complementary medicines is set at 0.5 ppm, as described in this TGA document.
The document explains that “Incidental metals and non-metals” must be less than 5 ppm total, and mercury in particular must be under 0.5 ppm in order to meet the TGA’s “acceptance criteria.”
Yet influenza vaccines contain 50 ppm mercury – 100 times the Australian government’s limit of 0.5 ppm.
Document discusses need to remove mercury from vaccines
Australia is known globally as an aggressive vaccination-pushing nation which systematically suppresses the speech of anyone who dares question the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
And yet a Natural News investigation has turned up a secure document (1) from 2001 that openly admits the government needed to find a way to remove thimerosal (mercury) from vaccines. (Note: There is still mercury in vaccines given to children in Australia, as you can see below.)
This document, found by Natural News investigators, says the Australian regulator of medicines sought to:
…promote the general use of vaccines without thiomersal and other organo-mercurial preservatives, particularly for single dose vaccines
There are three options:
* Reduce the amount of thiomersal in finished product (final lot)s.
* Eliminate thiomersal altogether.
* Eliminate thiomersal but substitute it by an alternative preservative.
(NOTE: “Thimerosal” in the USA is the same as “Thiomersal” in Australia.)
The same document goes on to say:
…obtaining vaccines without organo-mercury containing preservatives should be the ultimate goal, it is also possible, in a shorter timeframe, to reduce their concentration in the final product to residual levels, using physico-chemical methods to remove the preservative at intermediate production stages or by omitting or reducing their addition at the formulation step.
And why was Australia so interested in removing mercury from vaccines? Obviously because mercury is a public health risk when injected into the human body.
Australian researchers confirm mercury still found in pediatric vaccines in Australia
A 2010 scientific study published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (2) sought to determine whether vaccines administered to children in Australia still contained mercury. The Australian government and medical authorities have been lying to the public, you see, claiming all mercury had been removed from pediatric vaccines.
This study tested pediatric vaccines for mercury in much the same way I tested the influenza vaccine for mercury in my own lab. And the conclusion of the study speaks for itself:
The results of this study reveal that inaccuracies exist in public health messages, professional communications, and official documentation regarding Hg content in at least one childhood vaccine.
In other words, Australian officials LIED about the removal of mercury in vaccines. (Gee, is anyone surprised?)
According to this study, authored by the Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia, one of the pediatric vaccines contained nearly 10 ppb mercury.
For the record, what Natural News has documented in influenza vaccines is 5,000 times higher than what was detected by these researchers. (About 50,000 ppb.) And in the USA, these influenza vaccines are routinely given to pregnant women and children.
Total lies called “evidence based” medicine
As proof that Australian citizens are systematically lied to about all this, consider this page from the NPS MedicineWise organization which claims to be “Independent. Not-for-profit. Evidence based.”
This page flat-out lies to the public, stating:
Q: Do children’s vaccines contain mercury (thiomersal)?
A: None of the vaccines on the National Immunisation Program for children under five years of age contain thiomersal.
Thiomersal (or thimerosal) is a preservative that contains a form of mercury. It was used in very small amounts in vaccines from the 1930s onwards, to prevent contamination of vaccines.
Thiomersal has not been used as a preservative in Australian routine childhood vaccinations since 2000.
Evidence based? Apparently this organization is based more on wishful thinking and vaccine voodoo, because the real scientific evidence shows that pediatric vaccines (and flu shots given to pregnant mothers) still contain substantial levels of mercury.
Then again, no government ever tells the truth when it comes to vaccines. Almost by default, vaccines come pre-packaged with lies about safety, efficacy and mercury content. No wonder public trust in vaccines continues to erode…
Join the Australian Vaccination-Skeptics Network
If you live in Australia and you want to stay truly informed about vaccines, you need to read the AVN website at:
AVN.org.au
The site is a rich source of truthful, well-researched information on vaccines. For example, you’ll find the truth about thimerosal in DTPa vaccines on this page.
AVN has been so effective at reporting the truth about vaccines that its members have received death threats from insane vaccine pushers. Many vaccine pushers are brain damaged from mercury in vaccines, which causes not just impaired cognitive function but also extreme anger and tendencies toward violence. No group in modern medicine is more violent, irrational and dangerous than vaccine pushers.
Parents deserve to hear both sides so they can make an informed decision
Groups like AVN are crucial to the public discussion on vaccines. Governments and vaccine manufacturers only present the issue in a one-sided way, exaggerating the “benefits” of vaccines and utterly ignoring all risks. (They often fake their clinical trials, too, in order to present positive findings.)
Much like Natural News, AVN believes that people should have access to both sides of the debate so they can make informed decisions. We are not opposed to the theory of immunization; we are opposed to the use of toxic chemicals (and heavy metals) in vaccines as well as the rampant fraudulent marketing of vaccines around the world. The vaccine industry, in fact, created this opposition by lying to the public and hiding the truth about vaccine risks and side effects.
Real science, it turns out, is absolutely not welcomed in any discussion about vaccines. Vaccine promoters demand that everyone unquestionable accept all their statements and claims without any sense of skepticism or critical thinking. Such a position is not “scientific,” it is dogmatic. The real scientists are those who ask critical questions like, “Why are we injecting pregnant women and children with high levels of mercury?”
SCIENTIFIC FACT: The concentration of mercury in an influenza vaccine is higher than the mercury level found in China’s most polluted rivers.
Medicine shouldn’t contain poison. This is a fundamental principle which has been utterly abandoned by modern medicine. And then they wonder why more and more people are saying NO to vaccines!
Simply put, until governments and vaccine manufacturers stop lying and start telling the truth about vaccine risks vs. benefits, trust in the vaccine industry will continue to plummet. If the vaccine industry really wanted to re-establish trust with the public, they would first remove all mercury from vaccines then ask independent researchers like myself to test their vaccines in our own private labs so that the confirmation of the mercury removal can be trusted by the public at large.
Then again, the vaccine industry appears to have no real interest in removing mercury from vaccines in the first place. Ever wonder why?
Source
        
This posting includes an audio/video/photo media file: Download Now
Posted: 05 Jun 2014 06:35 AM PDT

Thousands of friends, supporters and members of Golden Dawn have gathered outside parliament in Athens demanding the immediate release of Golden Dawn political prisoners.
Golden Dawn’s jailed leaders Nikos Michaloliakos, Christos Pappas, and Giannis Lagos are speaking inside the Greek parliament regarding the issue of lifting parliamentary immunity.
In following video, Golden Dawn New York Division has done a translation of highlights from GD leader Nikolaos Michaloliakos’ speech in parliament.
He along with Giannis Lagos and Christos Pappas were given temporary release from prison to address the Parliament during a motion to lift parliamentary immunity.

Keep in mind this is just a partial translation of the speech, Golden Dawn New York Division is working on a more complete version, please spread this video around as much as possible.
In the video below, Michaloliakos leaves the Parliament Chamber to the cheers of supporters and says goodbye to his daughter Ourania. The chants roughly translate to:
“Listen Leader, and listen well! You have humiliated the system once again! Blood, Honor Golden Dawn!”

        
Posted: 05 Jun 2014 04:47 AM PDT

Two Eastern European nations, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, have refused to host foreign troops and military bases. The prime ministers of both countries have consecutively spoken against the proposal voiced by US President Barack Obama.
Following the example of their neighbor the Czech Republic, the prime minister of Slovakia stated that his country is ready to meet its obligations as a NATO member state, but stationing foreign troops on its territory is out of the question.
Slovak PM Robert Fico said he “can’t imagine foreign troops being deployed on our territory in the form of some bases.”
The proposal to host more NATO troops in Eastern Europe was voiced by Obama on his current tour of Europe.
Speaking at a news conference in Warsaw, Obama said America is stepping up its partnership with countries in Eastern Europe with a view to bolstering security.
Initially, it was Poland that asked for a greater US military presence in Eastern Europe.
In April, Polish Defense Minister Tomasz Siemoniak called on the Pentagon to deploy as many as 10,000 American troops in his country.
Three Baltic States welcomed the idea back in April. To begin with, a small contingent of American troops began to arrive in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to take part in military training.
Two countries opposed deployment of any foreign soldiers on their territory.
On Tuesday, Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka said his country sees no need to allow foreign military presence on its territory.
Last month, Defense Minister Martin Stropinsky sparked a political storm in the Czech Republic by recalling the 1968 invasion as the biggest reason not to host NATO troops in the country in a Reuters interview.
Slovakia’s Fico joined in the debate Wednesday, saying that for his country such a military presence is a sensitive issue because of the Warsaw Pact troops’ invasion into Czechoslovakia in 1968.
“Slovakia has its historical experience with participation of foreign troops. Let us remember the 1968 invasion. Therefore this topic is extraordinarily sensitive to us,” he said.
Fico said that Slovakia is committed to fulfill its obligations towards NATO despite military budget cuts and that allies would be allowed to train on Slovak territory anyway.
Czechoslovakia split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia in 1993.
The Czech Republic entered NATO in 1999, whereas Slovakia joined the alliance later, in 2004.
Fico’s Smer party, which has an absolute majority in Slovakia’s parliament, has been advocating warmer relations with Russia.
Source
        
Posted by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi at 09:16