Roberto Abraham Scaruffi

Tuesday, 12 April 2016

The European Union Times


Posted: 12 Apr 2016 08:55 AM PDT

A grim report circulating in the Kremlin today released by the Security Council (SC) says that His Holiness Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and All Russia, this afternoon, notified President Putin that his church’s efforts to persuade the United States and Great Britain to halt their “planned satanic ritual” next week to “welcome” into our solar system the recently discovered mysterious new planet has failed—and because of this failure the Federation should begin immediate preparations for a “wrath of God” event to occur shortly thereafter.
As we have previously reported about this mysterious new planet (Mysterious Planet Ejected From Black Hole At Center Of Galaxy Warned Could Soon Impact Earth and US Scientist Confirms Russian Fears Of New Planet, Warns Will Affect Earth Soon), Federation concerns about the effects it could have upon Earth have grown so severe that last week President Putin created, for the first time in Russia’s history, a National Guard force to safeguard the nation should the worst effects from this celestial body be realized as it has been in our planets ancient past.
The West’s response to this mysterious new planet though, this report notes, is to erect next week, 19 April, in Times Square (New York) and Trafalgar Square (London) a memorial to is arrival dedicated to the ancient “god” of this planet, Nibiru, the ancients called Moloch—and whom they preformed the ritualistic killing of children for.
Called by the name of Arch of the Temple of Bel, this report explains, the West’s plan to erect its memorial replicas in both New York and London next week (and 1,000 other cities around the world too) to honor the arrival of this mysterious planet is not fully understand by Western peoples as the name “Bel” is but another name for “Baal” (or Ba’al) having the ancient meaning of “lord/master”, but fails to denote that his particular arch was dedicated to the ancient “child murderer” Moloch.
His Holiness Patriarch Kirill in attempting to stop the West from committing this “abomination and outrage to God”, this report continues, met with Great Britain’s Ambassador to Russia, Dr. Laurie Bristow,on 5 April, and yesterday ,11 April, Metropolitan Hilarion of Volokolamsk, chairman of the Moscow Patriarchate’s Department for External Church Relations, met with Mr. John F. Tefft, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the United States of America to the Russian Federation.
At the conclusion of these meetings, this report says, neither the US or British ambassadors acknowledged the “grave Biblical implications” of what their nations were doing in celebrating this mysterious planet by memorializing the ancient god Moloch—with their saying, instead, that the fears of Russia’s church war “antiquated” and having “no relevance” to today’s “modern times”.
Both of these Western ambassadors, also, this report continues, stated that the replica Arch of the Temple of Bel’s to be placed around the world starting next week were initiated by the Institute for Digital Archaeologyand supported by Harvard University and UNESCO as part of our World’s Heritage celebrations.
Russian church officials countered these Western assertions about this “abomination” being erected to honor this barbaric ancient god, this report further notes, by pointing out the “innocent blood spilt” to honor Moloch throughout history—including last year when Obama regime supported Islamic terroristsbeheaded over 400 women and children beneath it and whose bodies were found in a mass grave after Federation forces helped liberate the Syrian city of Palmyra where it is located.
Also pointed out to these Western officials by Russian church leaders, this report says, is that the 19 April date to erect the first of these “abominations” in New York and London “confirms in essence” the “ritual sacrificial” significance of this event as it falls on the same day of the 19 April 1993 ending of the Waco Siegeand the 19 April 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing—that combined killed 248 innocent people, many of whom were defenseless children.
To any specific “wrath of God” event to follow the West’s honoring of this mysterious new planet by memorializing the ancient god Moloch next week this report doesn’t mention—other than to state that the last time human beings ignored God’s warning about celebrating this “god” (whom God said was his primary enemy) he destroyed their whole nation—which Israel still hasn’t fully recovered from thousands of years later, but they were warned about previously too.
Source
        
Posted: 12 Apr 2016 05:09 AM PDT
World Bank Group headquarters building in Washington DC, USA.
The World Bank says developing countries are increasingly seeking credit from the international financial institution at an alarming scale.
Demands for World Bank loans have reached levels not seen outside of financial crises as developing countries struggle with a weak global economy, said the monetary organization prior to its biannual meeting in Washington later this week.
The bank said it expected to lend more than $150bn (£105bn) in the four years from 2013 – a period when global economic activity repeatedly failed to match expectations, according to the Guardian.
It said it was increasing its financial assistance to both middle-income and the least-developed countries.
The report added that developing nations that depend on commodity exports have been hard hit over the past two years by the economic slowdown in China, which has led to a crash in the price of oil and industrial metals.
“We are in a global economy where growth is expected to remain weak, so it is critically important that the World Bank play our traditional role of helping developing countries accelerate growth,” said the bank’s president, Jim Yong Kim.
“We have an historic opportunity to end extreme poverty in the world by 2030 but the only way we can achieve this goal is if developing countries – from middle-income to low-income nations – get back on the path of faster growth that helps the poorest and most vulnerable.”
The world economic meltdown of 2008-09 led to a rise in World Bank lending to developing countries that struggled as trade and production fell at rates similar to those in the Great Depression of the late 1920s and early 30s.
Demand for loans subsequently fell back from a peak of $44bn in 2010 to $15bn in 2013, although the bank said it had risen to $23.5bn in 2015 and would top $25bn in 2016.
Source
        
Posted: 12 Apr 2016 04:56 AM PDT


The New York Times reported John Prince, 32, asked a question at the end of the event at the Apollo Theater, after Sanders had explained his Jewish heritage made him more sensitive to racism in the U.S. It did not enjoy a warm reception from the Jewish senator.
“As you know, the Zionist Jews and I don’t mean to offend anybody, they run the Federal Reserve, they run Wall Street, they run every campaign,” Prince said, referring to widespread accusations about powerful Jewish bankers such as Rothschild and Soros who secretly control world commerce.
Bernie Sanders immediately started waving his finger in denial and saying “NO, NO!” exactly when John Prince said that “Jews run the Federal Reserve”, denying the truth which everyone can see on Wikipedia that basically almost every single Chair and Vice-Chair of the Fed was Jewish including the most recent ones such as Alan Greenspan, Ben Bernanke and the current Chair Janet Yellen and the Vice-Chair Stanley Fischer.
Sanders responded, “Brother, brother, brother.”
“What is your affiliation to your Jewish community?” Prince continued. “That’s all I’m asking.”
“That’s not what you’re asking,” Sanders deflected Prince’s question into a question about the state of Israel. “That’s not what you’re asking.”
“I am proud to be Jewish,” the senator continued to a wide outbreak of applause. “… Let me just say this on the issue… You’re not going to find any candidate running for president, for example, talking about Zionism and the Middle East. I am a strong defender of Israel, but I also believe that we have got to pay attention to the needs of the Palestinian people… there are bad people on both sides.”
        
Posted: 12 Apr 2016 03:32 AM PDT

A Russian MP representing populist nationalist party LDPR had drafted a bill under which women who refuse to have an abortion and give their newborn baby to the state would receive one-time monetary compensation of about $3,700.
The measure would allow the state “to boost the birth rate and give those children who were doomed to die before being born, a chance to live,” the sponsors of the bill wrote in an explanatory note attached with the draft.
“Currently, only about 20 percent of women who want an abortion abandon their intention. Material stimuli could help to significantly improve this figure,” State Duma MP Aleksandr Sherin has stated in the note.
The bill reads that, in order to receive the money, a pregnant woman must address the authorities with a set of papers, including her passport, a doctor’s certificate estimating how far along the pregnancy is, and the date on which she is expected to give birth. There should also be a special letter outlining an obligation not to undertake an abortion, certified by doctors.
The proposed amount of compensation is 250,000 rubles (about $3700), but the sponsors of the bill propose that it should be recalculated every year with adjustments for inflation. The bill separately specifies that no government agency or official can ask how the women spend this sum.
According to Sherin’s preliminary calculations, the estimated number of women who would accept the offer is between 150,000 and 200,000, which means that the budget for the project will not exceed 50 billion rubles per year (about $745 million).
The existing Russian law on abortions is fairly liberal, but conservative lawmakers are making attempts to tighten it. In May 2015, MPs representing the parliamentary majority United Russia party and the center-left opposition Fair Russia party drafted a bill that would limit state insurance payments for abortions, ban private clinics from performing them and allow women to buy morning-after pills only on prescription after an obligatory health check. The lawmakers also proposed that any woman seeking an abortion should undergo an ultrasound scan of her womb as, “according to statistics, up to 80 percent of them refuse to have the abortion when they see their child on the screen.”
The motion has not yet been passed by the State Duma.
The main sponsor of the anti-abortion drafts, MP Elena Mizulina (Fair Russia) earlier called upon the community to stop tolerating abortions and surrogacy, as they threaten to wipe out the population in Russia and the world as a whole. In mid-2014, a group of activists representing the Russian Orthodox Church claimed they had gathered 100,000 signatures for a petition seeking a complete ban on abortions in Russia – enough to make it a valid legislative initiative. However, that proposal has not yet made it into a bill.
Source
        
Posted: 12 Apr 2016 03:13 AM PDT


On Sunday Ukrainian prime minister Yatsenyuk resigned, just four days after the Dutch voted against Ukraine joining the European Union. Taken together, these two events are clear signals that the US-backed coup in Ukraine has not given that country freedom and democracy. They also suggest a deeper dissatisfaction among Europeans over Washington’s addiction to interventionism.
According to US and EU governments – and repeated without question by the mainstream media – the Ukrainian people stood up on their own in 2014 to throw off the chains of a corrupt government in the back pocket of Moscow and finally plant themselves in the pro-west camp. According to these people, US government personnel who handed out cookies and even took the stage in Kiev to urge the people to overthrow their government had nothing at all to do with the coup.
When Assistant Secretary of State Victoria Nuland was videotaped bragging about how the US government spent $5 billion to “promote democracy” in Ukraine, it had nothing to do with the overthrow of the Yanukovich government. When Nuland was recorded telling the US Ambassador in Kiev that Yatsenyuk is the US choice for prime minister, it was not US interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine. In fact, the neocons still consider it a “conspiracy theory” to suggest the US had anything to do with the overthrow.
I have no doubt that the previous government was corrupt. Corruption is the stock-in-trade of governments. But according to Transparency International, corruption in the Ukrainian government is about the same after the US-backed coup as it was before. So the intervention failed to improve anything, and now the US-installed government is falling apart. Is a Ukraine in chaos to be considered a Washington success story?
This brings us back to the Dutch vote. The overwhelming rejection of the EU plan for Ukrainian membership demonstrates the deep level of frustration and anger in Europe over EU leadership following Washington’s interventionist foreign policy at the expense of European security and prosperity. The other EU member countries did not even dare hold popular referenda on the matter – their parliaments rubber-stamped the agreement.
Brussels backs US bombing in the Middle East and hundreds of thousands of refugees produced by the bombing overwhelm Europe. The people are told they must be taxed even more to pay for the victims of Washington’s foreign policy.
Brussels backs US regime change plans for Ukraine and EU citizens are told they must bear the burden of bringing an economic basket case up to European standards. How much would it cost EU citizens to bring in Ukraine as a member? No one dares mention it. But Europeans are rightly angry with their leaders blindly following Washington and then leaving them holding the bag.
The anger is rising and there is no telling where it will end. In June, the United Kingdom will vote on whether to exit the European Union. The campaign for an exit is broad-based, bringing in conservatives, populists, and progressives. Regardless of the outcome, the vote should be considered very important. Europeans are tired of their unelected leaders in Brussels pushing them around and destroying their financial and personal security by following Washington’s foolish interventionism. No one can call any of these recent interventions a success and the Europeans know it.
One way or the other, the US empire is coming to an end. Either the money will go or the allies will go, but it cannot be sustained. The sooner the American people demand an end to these foolish policies the better.
Source
        
Posted by Roberto Abraham Scaruffi at 18:15